Home > Snowmobiles > 2013 Arctic Cat Sno Pro 500

2013 Arctic Cat Sno Pro 500

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related

2013 Arctic Cat Sno Pro 500

Compare with other Snowmobiles
Compare

2013 Arctic Cat Sno Pro 500

VS

All other Snowmobiles

General
Model Year		2013			compare 2013 Snowmobiles
Manufacturer		Arctic Cat	vs	24.6% Snowmobiles have Arctic Cat
Model Type		Performance	vs	24% Snowmobiles have Performance	compare Performance Snowmobiles
BASE MSRP(US)		8799 (8790 higher than average)	vs	9,136	Compare similar BASE MSRP(US) (8,799)
Warranty (months)		12

Engine
Fuel capacity		11 gal (0.41 gal higher than average)	vs	10.59 gal
Cylinders		2 (0.15 lower than average)	vs	2.15	Compare similar Cylinders (2)
Starter		Pull	vs	46.6% Snowmobiles have Pull	compare Pull Snowmobiles
Engine Type		Horizontal In-line	vs	87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line	compare Horizontal In-line Snowmobiles
Engine Stroke		2 (0.69 lower than average)	vs	2.69	Compare similar Engine Stroke (2)
Valve Configuration		Reed Valve	vs	65.5% Snowmobiles have Reed Valve	compare Reed Valve Snowmobiles
Displacement		499 cc (194.69 cc lower than average)	vs	693.69 cc
Turbocharged		No	vs	93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged	Compare similar don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type		Fuel Injected	vs	57.1% Snowmobiles have Fuel Injected	compare Fuel Injected Snowmobiles
Reverse		Yes	vs	90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse

Dimensions
Length (ft)		9.75 (0.29 lower than average)	vs	10.04
Width		48 in (24.74 in higher than average)	vs	23.26 in
Maximum Ski Stance		43 in (1.95 in higher than average)	vs	41.05 in	Compare similar Maximum Ski Stance (43) in
Minimum Ski Stance		43 in (2.5 in higher than average)	vs	40.50 in	Compare similar Minimum Ski Stance (43) in
Track Length		128 in (8.11 in lower than average)	vs	136.11 in	Compare similar Track Length (128) in
Track Width		15 in (0.57 in lower than average)	vs	15.57 in	Compare similar Track Width (15) in
Lug Height		1 in (0.38 in lower than average)	vs	1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips		Standard

Materials
Ski Material		Plastic	vs	76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic	compare Plastic Snowmobiles
Skag Material		Carbide	vs	71.8% Snowmobiles have Carbide	compare Carbide Snowmobiles

Glass
Height		Low	vs	37.8% Snowmobiles have Low	compare Low Snowmobiles

Seats
Number Of Seats		1 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	1.31	Compare similar Number Of Seats (1)

Related Comparisons

2013 Polaris Switchback 800 Assault 144

2013 Arctic Cat Sno Pro 500

2013 Polaris PRO-RMK 800 163

2013 Arctic Cat Sno Pro 500

2013 Arctic Cat ProClimb M1100 Turbo 162 HCR

2013 Arctic Cat Sno Pro 500

2013 Polaris RMK 800 Assault 155

2013 Arctic Cat Sno Pro 500

2013 Ski-Doo Freeride 137 800R E-TEC

2013 Arctic Cat Sno Pro 500

2013 Ski-Doo Summit Sport 800R Power T.E.K.

2013 Arctic Cat Sno Pro 500

Popular Items

2013 Polaris Switchback 800 Assault 144 Compare

2013 Polaris PRO-RMK 800 163 Compare

2013 Arctic Cat ProClimb M1100 Turbo 162 HCR Compare

2013 Polaris RMK 800 Assault 155 Compare

2013 Ski-Doo Freeride 137 800R E-TEC Compare

2013 Ski-Doo Summit Sport 800R Power T.E.K. Compare