VS

Home > Snowmobiles > 2013 Ski-Doo Freeride 137 800R E-TEC

2013 Ski-Doo Freeride 137 800R E-TEC

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
2013 Ski-Doo Freeride 137 800R E-TEC
Compare with other Snowmobiles
 Compare
2013 Ski-Doo Freeride 137 800R E-TEC VS
All other Snowmobiles
General
Model Year 2013  
Manufacturer Ski-doo   vs 37.2% Snowmobiles have Ski-Doo
Model Type Mountain  vs 27.1% Snowmobiles have Mountain
BASE MSRP(US)
13499  (13490 higher than average)
vs
9,136

Warranty (months) 12  
Engine
Fuel capacity
10.6 gal (0.01 gal higher than average)
vs
10.59 gal

Cylinders
(0.15 lower than average)
vs
2.15

Starter Pull  vs 46.6% Snowmobiles have Pull
Engine Type Horizontal In-line  vs 87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line
Engine Stroke
(0.69 lower than average)
vs
2.69

Valve Configuration Reed Valve  vs 65.5% Snowmobiles have Reed Valve
Displacement
799.5 cc (105.81 cc higher than average)
vs
693.69 cc

Turbocharged No  vs 93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type Fuel Injected  vs 57.1% Snowmobiles have Fuel Injected
Reverse Yes  vs 90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse
Dimensions
Length (ft)
10.2  (0.16 higher than average)
vs
10.04

Width
46.6 in (23.34 in higher than average)
vs
23.26 in

Height
51.2 in (10.97 in higher than average)
vs
40.23 in

Maximum Ski Stance
40.1 in (0.95 in lower than average)
vs
41.05 in

Minimum Ski Stance
38.4 in (2.1 in lower than average)
vs
40.50 in

Dry weight
483 lbs (19.55 lbs lower than average)
vs
502.55 lbs

Track Length
137 in (0.89 in higher than average)
vs
136.11 in

Track Width
16 in (0.43 in higher than average)
vs
15.57 in

Lug Height
2.25 in (0.87 in higher than average)
vs
1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips Standard 
Adjustable Ski Stance Standard 
Rear Rack Standard 
Materials
Ski Material Plastic  vs 76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic
Skag Material Dual Carbide  vs 28% Snowmobiles have Dual Carbide
Glass
Height Low  vs 37.8% Snowmobiles have Low
Seats
Number Of Seats
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
1.31



Scroll To Top

saved