VS

Home > Snowmobiles > 2013 Polaris PRO-RMK 800 163

2013 Polaris PRO-RMK 800 163

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
2013 Polaris PRO-RMK 800 163
Compare with other Snowmobiles
 Compare
2013 Polaris PRO-RMK 800 163 VS
All other Snowmobiles
General
Model Year 2013  
Manufacturer Polaris   vs 24% Snowmobiles have Polaris
Model Type Mountain  vs 27.1% Snowmobiles have Mountain
BASE MSRP(US)
12499  (12490 higher than average)
vs
9,136

Warranty (months) 12  
Engine
Fuel capacity
11.5 gal (0.91 gal higher than average)
vs
10.59 gal

Cylinders
(0.15 lower than average)
vs
2.15

Starter Pull  vs 46.6% Snowmobiles have Pull
Engine Type Horizontal In-line  vs 87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line
Engine Stroke
(0.69 lower than average)
vs
2.69

Valve Configuration Reed Valve  vs 65.5% Snowmobiles have Reed Valve
Displacement
795 cc (101.31 cc higher than average)
vs
693.69 cc

Turbocharged No  vs 93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type Fuel Injected  vs 57.1% Snowmobiles have Fuel Injected
Reverse Yes  vs 90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse
Dimensions
Length (ft)
11.17  (1.13 higher than average)
vs
10.04

Width
46.5 in (23.24 in higher than average)
vs
23.26 in

Height
51 in (10.77 in higher than average)
vs
40.23 in

Maximum Ski Stance
41 in (0.05 in lower than average)
vs
41.05 in

Minimum Ski Stance
39 in (1.5 in lower than average)
vs
40.50 in

Dry weight
424 lbs (78.55 lbs lower than average)
vs
502.55 lbs

Track Length
163 in (26.89 in higher than average)
vs
136.11 in

Track Width
15 in (0.57 in lower than average)
vs
15.57 in

Lug Height
2.4 in (1.02 in higher than average)
vs
1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips Standard 
Adjustable Ski Stance Standard 
Materials
Ski Material Plastic  vs 76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic
Skag Material Carbide  vs 71.8% Snowmobiles have Carbide
Glass
Height Mid  vs 27.3% Snowmobiles have Mid
Seats
Number Of Seats
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
1.31



Scroll To Top

saved