Home > Snowmobiles > 2009 Arctic Cat T Z1 Turbo Touring LXR

2009 Arctic Cat T Z1 Turbo Touring LXR

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related

2009 Arctic Cat T Z1 Turbo Touring LXR

Compare with other Snowmobiles
Compare

2009 Arctic Cat T Z1 Turbo Touring LXR

VS

All other Snowmobiles

General
Model Year		2009			compare 2009 Snowmobiles
Manufacturer		Arctic Cat	vs	24.6% Snowmobiles have Arctic Cat
Model Type		Touring	vs	15.1% Snowmobiles have Touring	compare Touring Snowmobiles
BASE MSRP(US)		13999 (13990 higher than average)	vs	9,136	Compare similar BASE MSRP(US) (13,999)
Warranty (months)		12

Engine
Fuel capacity		10.8 gal (0.21 gal higher than average)	vs	10.59 gal
Cylinders		2 (0.15 lower than average)	vs	2.15	Compare similar Cylinders (2)
Starter		Electric / Pull With Remote	vs	0.4% Snowmobiles have Electric / Pull With Remote	compare Electric / Pull With Remote Snowmobiles
Engine Type		Horizontal In-line	vs	87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line	compare Horizontal In-line Snowmobiles
Engine Stroke		4 (1.31 higher than average)	vs	2.69	Compare similar Engine Stroke (4)
Valve Configuration		DOHC	vs	17.6% Snowmobiles have DOHC	compare DOHC Snowmobiles
Displacement		1056 cc (362.31 cc higher than average)	vs	693.69 cc
Turbocharged		Yes	vs	6.1% Snowmobiles have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type		Fuel Injected	vs	57.1% Snowmobiles have Fuel Injected	compare Fuel Injected Snowmobiles
Reverse		Yes	vs	90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse

Dimensions
Length (ft)		10.67 (0.63 higher than average)	vs	10.04
Width		47 in (23.74 in higher than average)	vs	23.26 in
Maximum Ski Stance		43 in (1.95 in higher than average)	vs	41.05 in	Compare similar Maximum Ski Stance (43) in
Minimum Ski Stance		43 in (2.5 in higher than average)	vs	40.50 in	Compare similar Minimum Ski Stance (43) in
Track Length		144 in (7.89 in higher than average)	vs	136.11 in	Compare similar Track Length (144) in
Track Width		15 in (0.57 in lower than average)	vs	15.57 in	Compare similar Track Width (15) in
Lug Height		1 in (0.38 in lower than average)	vs	1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips		Standard
Rear Rack		Standard

Materials
Ski Material		Plastic	vs	76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic	compare Plastic Snowmobiles
Skag Material		Dual Carbide	vs	28% Snowmobiles have Dual Carbide	compare Dual Carbide Snowmobiles

Glass
Height		Mid	vs	27.3% Snowmobiles have Mid	compare Mid Snowmobiles
Rearview Mirrors		Standard

Seats
Number Of Seats		2 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	1.31	Compare similar Number Of Seats (2)
Seat Backrest		Standard

Related Comparisons

2009 Polaris SwitchBack 600 Dragon

2009 Arctic Cat T Z1 Turbo Touring LXR

2009 Polaris SwitchBack 800

2009 Arctic Cat T Z1 Turbo Touring LXR

2009 Arctic Cat M8 EFI 153 LE

2009 Arctic Cat T Z1 Turbo Touring LXR

2009 Polaris RMK 800 Shift (144-Inch)

2009 Arctic Cat T Z1 Turbo Touring LXR

2009 Polaris RMK 800 Dragon (163-Inch)

2009 Arctic Cat T Z1 Turbo Touring LXR

2009 Yamaha FX Nytro MTX

2009 Arctic Cat T Z1 Turbo Touring LXR

Popular Items

2009 Polaris SwitchBack 600 Dragon Compare

2009 Polaris SwitchBack 800 Compare

2009 Arctic Cat M8 EFI 153 LE Compare

2009 Polaris RMK 800 Shift (144-Inch) Compare

2009 Polaris RMK 800 Dragon (163-Inch) Compare

2009 Yamaha FX Nytro MTX Compare