VS

Home > Snowmobiles > 2009 Polaris SwitchBack 600 Dragon

2009 Polaris SwitchBack 600 Dragon

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
2009 Polaris SwitchBack 600 Dragon
Compare with other Snowmobiles
 Compare
2009 Polaris SwitchBack 600 Dragon VS
All other Snowmobiles
General
Model Year 2009  
Manufacturer Polaris   vs 24% Snowmobiles have Polaris
Model Type Mountain  vs 27.1% Snowmobiles have Mountain
BASE MSRP(US)
9899  (9890 higher than average)
vs
9,136

Warranty (months) 12  
Engine
Fuel capacity
11.5 gal (0.91 gal higher than average)
vs
10.59 gal

Cylinders
(0.15 lower than average)
vs
2.15

Starter Electric  vs 31.3% Snowmobiles have electric
Engine Type Horizontal In-line  vs 87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line
Engine Stroke
(0.69 lower than average)
vs
2.69

Valve Configuration Reed Valve  vs 65.5% Snowmobiles have Reed Valve
Displacement
599 cc (94.69 cc lower than average)
vs
693.69 cc

Turbocharged No  vs 93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type Fuel Injected  vs 57.1% Snowmobiles have Fuel Injected
Reverse Yes  vs 90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse
Dimensions
Length (ft)
10  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
10.04

Width
48 in (24.74 in higher than average)
vs
23.26 in

Height
48.5 in (8.27 in higher than average)
vs
40.23 in

Maximum Ski Stance
42.5 in (1.45 in higher than average)
vs
41.05 in

Minimum Ski Stance
42.5 in (2 in higher than average)
vs
40.50 in

Dry weight
526 lbs (23.45 lbs higher than average)
vs
502.55 lbs

Track Length
136 in (0.11 in lower than average)
vs
136.11 in

Track Width
15 in (0.57 in lower than average)
vs
15.57 in

Lug Height
1.25 in (0.13 in lower than average)
vs
1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips Standard 
Rear Rack Standard 
Materials
Ski Material Composite  vs 20.7% Snowmobiles have Composite
Skag Material Carbide  vs 71.8% Snowmobiles have Carbide
Glass
Height Low  vs 37.8% Snowmobiles have Low
Seats
Number Of Seats
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
1.31



Scroll To Top

saved