Home > Snowmobiles > 2009 Arctic Cat CrossFire R 8

2009 Arctic Cat CrossFire R 8

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related

2009 Arctic Cat CrossFire R 8

Compare with other Snowmobiles
Compare

2009 Arctic Cat CrossFire R 8

VS

All other Snowmobiles

General
Model Year		2009			compare 2009 Snowmobiles
Manufacturer		Arctic Cat	vs	24.6% Snowmobiles have Arctic Cat
Model Type		Performance	vs	24% Snowmobiles have Performance	compare Performance Snowmobiles
BASE MSRP(US)		9799 (9790 higher than average)	vs	9,136	Compare similar BASE MSRP(US) (9,799)
Warranty (months)		12

Engine
Fuel capacity		12.2 gal (1.61 gal higher than average)	vs	10.59 gal
Cylinders		2 (0.15 lower than average)	vs	2.15	Compare similar Cylinders (2)
Starter		Electric / Pull	vs	21.4% Snowmobiles have Electric / Pull	compare Electric / Pull Snowmobiles
Engine Type		Horizontal In-line	vs	87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line	compare Horizontal In-line Snowmobiles
Engine Stroke		2 (0.69 lower than average)	vs	2.69	Compare similar Engine Stroke (2)
Valve Configuration		Reed Valve	vs	65.5% Snowmobiles have Reed Valve	compare Reed Valve Snowmobiles
Displacement		794 cc (100.31 cc higher than average)	vs	693.69 cc
Turbocharged		No	vs	93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged	Compare similar don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type		Fuel Injected	vs	57.1% Snowmobiles have Fuel Injected	compare Fuel Injected Snowmobiles
Reverse		Yes	vs	90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse

Dimensions
Length (ft)		10.08 (0.04 higher than average)	vs	10.04
Width		48 in (24.74 in higher than average)	vs	23.26 in
Maximum Ski Stance		44 in (2.95 in higher than average)	vs	41.05 in	Compare similar Maximum Ski Stance (44) in
Minimum Ski Stance		42 in (1.5 in higher than average)	vs	40.50 in	Compare similar Minimum Ski Stance (42) in
Track Length		128 in (8.11 in lower than average)	vs	136.11 in	Compare similar Track Length (128) in
Track Width		14 in (1.57 in lower than average)	vs	15.57 in	Compare similar Track Width (14) in
Lug Height		1 in (0.38 in lower than average)	vs	1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips		Standard
Adjustable Ski Stance		Standard

Materials
Ski Material		Plastic	vs	76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic	compare Plastic Snowmobiles
Skag Material		Dual Carbide	vs	28% Snowmobiles have Dual Carbide	compare Dual Carbide Snowmobiles

Glass
Height		Mid	vs	27.3% Snowmobiles have Mid	compare Mid Snowmobiles

Seats
Number Of Seats		1 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	1.31	Compare similar Number Of Seats (1)

Related Comparisons

2009 Polaris SwitchBack 600 Dragon

2009 Arctic Cat CrossFire R 8

2009 Polaris SwitchBack 800

2009 Arctic Cat CrossFire R 8

2009 Arctic Cat M8 EFI 153 LE

2009 Arctic Cat CrossFire R 8

2009 Polaris RMK 800 Shift (144-Inch)

2009 Arctic Cat CrossFire R 8

2009 Polaris RMK 800 Dragon (163-Inch)

2009 Arctic Cat CrossFire R 8

2009 Yamaha FX Nytro MTX

2009 Arctic Cat CrossFire R 8

Popular Items

2009 Polaris SwitchBack 600 Dragon Compare

2009 Polaris SwitchBack 800 Compare

2009 Arctic Cat M8 EFI 153 LE Compare

2009 Polaris RMK 800 Shift (144-Inch) Compare

2009 Polaris RMK 800 Dragon (163-Inch) Compare

2009 Yamaha FX Nytro MTX Compare