Home > Snowmobiles > 2005 Polaris PRO X 120

2005 Polaris PRO X 120

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related

2005 Polaris PRO X 120

Compare with other Snowmobiles
Compare

2005 Polaris PRO X 120

VS

All other Snowmobiles

General
Model Year		2005			compare 2005 Snowmobiles
Manufacturer		Polaris	vs	24% Snowmobiles have Polaris
Model Type		Youth	vs	4.6% Snowmobiles have Youth	compare Youth Snowmobiles
BASE MSRP(US)		2099 (2090 higher than average)	vs	9,136	Compare similar BASE MSRP(US) (2099)
Warranty (months)		12

Engine
Fuel capacity		0.5 gal (10.09 gal lower than average)	vs	10.59 gal
Cylinders		1 (1.15 lower than average)	vs	2.15	Compare similar Cylinders (1)
Starter		Pull	vs	46.6% Snowmobiles have Pull	compare Pull Snowmobiles
Engine Type		Single-cylinder	vs	6.3% Snowmobiles have Single-Cylinder	compare Single-Cylinder Snowmobiles
Engine Stroke		4 (1.31 higher than average)	vs	2.69	Compare similar Engine Stroke (4)
Valve Configuration		OHV	vs	15.3% Snowmobiles have OHV	compare OHV Snowmobiles
Displacement		121 cc (572.69 cc lower than average)	vs	693.69 cc
Turbocharged		No	vs	93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged	Compare similar don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type		Carburetor	vs	42.9% Snowmobiles have Carburetor	compare Carburetor Snowmobiles
Reverse		No	vs	9.1% Snowmobiles don't have Reverse	Compare similar don't have Reverse

Dimensions
Length (ft)		6.25 (3.79 lower than average)	vs	10.04
Width		34 in (10.74 in higher than average)	vs	23.26 in
Height		31 in (9.23 in lower than average)	vs	40.23 in
Maximum Ski Stance		30 in (11.05 in lower than average)	vs	41.05 in	Compare similar Maximum Ski Stance (30) in
Minimum Ski Stance		30 in (10.5 in lower than average)	vs	40.50 in	Compare similar Minimum Ski Stance (30) in
Track Length		69 in (67.11 in lower than average)	vs	136.11 in	Compare similar Track Length (69) in
Track Width		10 in (5.57 in lower than average)	vs	15.57 in	Compare similar Track Width (10) in
Lug Height		0.79 in (0.59 in lower than average)	vs	1.38 in

Materials
Ski Material		Composite	vs	20.7% Snowmobiles have Composite	compare Composite Snowmobiles
Skag Material		Carbide	vs	71.8% Snowmobiles have Carbide	compare Carbide Snowmobiles

Glass
Height		Mid	vs	27.3% Snowmobiles have Mid	compare Mid Snowmobiles

Seats
Number Of Seats		1 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	1.31	Compare similar Number Of Seats (1)

Related Comparisons

2005 Arctic Cat M7 EFI 141

2005 Polaris PRO X 120

2005 Polaris RMK 800 (151-Inch)

2005 Polaris PRO X 120

2005 Polaris RMK Trail

2005 Polaris PRO X 120

2005 Polaris RMK 900 (166-Inch Anniversary)

2005 Polaris PRO X 120

2005 Polaris RMK 700 (151-Inch)

2005 Polaris PRO X 120

2005 Yamaha RS Vector Mountain

2005 Polaris PRO X 120

Popular Items

2005 Arctic Cat M7 EFI 141 Compare

2005 Polaris RMK 800 (151-Inch) Compare

2005 Polaris RMK Trail Compare

2005 Polaris RMK 900 (166-Inch Anniversary) Compare

2005 Polaris RMK 700 (151-Inch) Compare

2005 Yamaha RS Vector Mountain Compare