VS

Home > Snowmobiles > 2005 Polaris RMK 900 (166-Inch Anniversary)

2005 Polaris RMK 900 (166-Inch Anniversary)

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
2005 Polaris RMK 900 (166-Inch Anniversary)
Compare with other Snowmobiles
 Compare
2005 Polaris RMK 900 (166-Inch Anniversary) VS
All other Snowmobiles
General
Model Year 2005  
Manufacturer Polaris   vs 24% Snowmobiles have Polaris
Model Type Mountain  vs 27.1% Snowmobiles have Mountain
BASE MSRP(US)
10999  (10990 higher than average)
vs
9,136

Warranty (months) 12  
Engine
Fuel capacity
10.8 gal (0.21 gal higher than average)
vs
10.59 gal

Cylinders
(0.15 lower than average)
vs
2.15

Starter Pull  vs 46.6% Snowmobiles have Pull
Engine Type Horizontal In-line  vs 87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line
Engine Stroke
(0.69 lower than average)
vs
2.69

Valve Configuration Reed Valve  vs 65.5% Snowmobiles have Reed Valve
Displacement
866 cc (172.31 cc higher than average)
vs
693.69 cc

Turbocharged No  vs 93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type Fuel Injected  vs 57.1% Snowmobiles have Fuel Injected
Reverse Yes  vs 90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse
Dimensions
Length (ft)
11.17  (1.13 higher than average)
vs
10.04

Width
46.5 in (23.24 in higher than average)
vs
23.26 in

Height
46.5 in (6.27 in higher than average)
vs
40.23 in

Maximum Ski Stance
41 in (0.05 in lower than average)
vs
41.05 in

Minimum Ski Stance
41 in (0.5 in higher than average)
vs
40.50 in

Track Length
166 in (29.89 in higher than average)
vs
136.11 in

Track Width
15 in (0.57 in lower than average)
vs
15.57 in

Lug Height
2.4 in (1.02 in higher than average)
vs
1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips Standard 
Rear Rack Standard 
Materials
Ski Material Composite  vs 20.7% Snowmobiles have Composite
Skag Material Carbide  vs 71.8% Snowmobiles have Carbide
Glass
Height Low  vs 37.8% Snowmobiles have Low
Seats
Number Of Seats
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
1.31



Scroll To Top

saved