VS

Home > Snowmobiles > 2005 Arctic Cat ZR 900 EFI Sno Pro

2005 Arctic Cat ZR 900 EFI Sno Pro

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
2005 Arctic Cat ZR 900 EFI Sno Pro
Compare with other Snowmobiles
 Compare
2005 Arctic Cat ZR 900 EFI Sno Pro VS
All other Snowmobiles
General
Model Year 2005  
Manufacturer Arctic Cat   vs 24.6% Snowmobiles have Arctic Cat
Model Type Performance  vs 24% Snowmobiles have Performance
BASE MSRP(US)
9999  (9990 higher than average)
vs
9,136

Warranty (months) 12  
Engine
Fuel capacity
12 gal (1.41 gal higher than average)
vs
10.59 gal

Cylinders
(0.15 lower than average)
vs
2.15

Starter Pull  vs 46.6% Snowmobiles have Pull
Engine Type Horizontal In-line  vs 87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line
Engine Stroke
(0.69 lower than average)
vs
2.69

Valve Configuration Reed Valve  vs 65.5% Snowmobiles have Reed Valve
Displacement
862 cc (168.31 cc higher than average)
vs
693.69 cc

Turbocharged No  vs 93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type Fuel Injected  vs 57.1% Snowmobiles have Fuel Injected
Reverse No  vs 9.1% Snowmobiles don't have Reverse
Dimensions
Length (ft)
9.33  (0.71 lower than average)
vs
10.04

Width
48 in (24.74 in higher than average)
vs
23.26 in

Height
45 in (4.77 in higher than average)
vs
40.23 in

Maximum Ski Stance
43 in (1.95 in higher than average)
vs
41.05 in

Minimum Ski Stance
43 in (2.5 in higher than average)
vs
40.50 in

Dry weight
516 lbs (13.45 lbs higher than average)
vs
502.55 lbs

Track Length
121 in (15.11 in lower than average)
vs
136.11 in

Track Width
15 in (0.57 in lower than average)
vs
15.57 in

Lug Height
1.4 in (0.02 in higher than average)
vs
1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips Standard 
Materials
Ski Material Plastic  vs 76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic
Skag Material Carbide  vs 71.8% Snowmobiles have Carbide
Glass
Height Low  vs 37.8% Snowmobiles have Low
Seats
Number Of Seats
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
1.31



Scroll To Top

saved