VS

Home > Snowmobiles > 2005 Arctic Cat T660 Turbo ST

2005 Arctic Cat T660 Turbo ST

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
2005 Arctic Cat T660 Turbo ST
Compare with other Snowmobiles
 Compare
2005 Arctic Cat T660 Turbo ST VS
All other Snowmobiles
General
Model Year 2005  
Manufacturer Arctic Cat   vs 24.6% Snowmobiles have Arctic Cat
Model Type Performance  vs 24% Snowmobiles have Performance
BASE MSRP(US)
9399  (9390 higher than average)
vs
9,136

Warranty (months) 12  
Engine
Fuel capacity
12 gal (1.41 gal higher than average)
vs
10.59 gal

Cylinders
(0.85 higher than average)
vs
2.15

Starter Electric / Pull  vs 21.4% Snowmobiles have Electric / Pull
Engine Type In-line  vs 2.9% Snowmobiles have In-line
Engine Stroke
(1.31 higher than average)
vs
2.69

Valve Configuration OHV   vs 15.3% Snowmobiles have OHV
Displacement
660 cc (33.69 cc lower than average)
vs
693.69 cc

Turbocharged Yes  vs 6.1% Snowmobiles have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type Fuel Injected  vs 57.1% Snowmobiles have Fuel Injected
Reverse Yes  vs 90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse
Dimensions
Length (ft)
9.33  (0.71 lower than average)
vs
10.04

Width
48 in (24.74 in higher than average)
vs
23.26 in

Height
48 in (7.77 in higher than average)
vs
40.23 in

Maximum Ski Stance
43 in (1.95 in higher than average)
vs
41.05 in

Minimum Ski Stance
43 in (2.5 in higher than average)
vs
40.50 in

Dry weight
570 lbs (67.45 lbs higher than average)
vs
502.55 lbs

Track Length
121 in (15.11 in lower than average)
vs
136.11 in

Track Width
15 in (0.57 in lower than average)
vs
15.57 in

Lug Height
1 in (0.38 in lower than average)
vs
1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips Standard 
Materials
Ski Material Plastic  vs 76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic
Skag Material Carbide  vs 71.8% Snowmobiles have Carbide
Glass
Height Low  vs 37.8% Snowmobiles have Low
Seats
Number Of Seats
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
1.31



Scroll To Top

saved