Back
 Add

Compare:

2012 Polaris RMK 600 144 VS 2012 Arctic Cat Bearcat 570
 

Overview:

There are 11 differences and 20 similarities between 2012 Polaris RMK 600 144, 2012 Arctic Cat Bearcat 570

General
Model Year
2012 2012
Manufacturer
Polaris Arctic Cat
Model Type
Mountain Utility
BASE MSRP(US)
9,499		 7,899
Warranty (months)
12 12
Engine
Fuel capacity
11.5 gal		 10.8 gal
Cylinders
2		 2
Starter
Pull Electric
Engine Type
Horizontal In-line Horizontal In-line
Engine Stroke
2		 2
Valve Configuration
Reed Valve Reed Valve
Displacement
599 cc		 565 cc
Turbocharged
No No
Carburetion Type
Fuel Injected Carburetor
Reverse
Yes Yes
Dimensions
Length (ft)
10.42		 10.67
Width
46.5 in		 52 in
Height
51 in
Maximum Ski Stance
41 in		 44 in
Minimum Ski Stance
39 in		 40 in
Dry weight
453 lbs
Track Length
144 in		 151 in
Track Width
15 in		 15 in
Lug Height
2 in		 1.25 in
Features
Heated Hand Grips
Standard Standard
Adjustable Ski Stance
Standard Standard
Materials
Ski Material
Plastic Plastic
Skag Material
Carbide Carbide
Glass
Height
Mid High
Seats
Number Of Seats
1		 2
Seat Backrest
Standard
Related Comparisons
2012 Ski-Doo Summit SP 800R E-TEC
vs
2012 Polaris RMK 600 144
2012 Ski-Doo Summit SP 800R E-TEC
vs
2012 Arctic Cat Bearcat 570
2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153
vs
2012 Polaris RMK 600 144
2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153
vs
2012 Arctic Cat Bearcat 570
2012 Polaris RMK 600 144
vs
2012 Polaris PRO-RMK 600 155
2012 Polaris RMK 600 144
vs
2012 Ski-Doo Summit Sport 600
Popular Comparisons
2013 Polaris RMK 800 Assault 155
vs
2010 Polaris RMK 800 Dragon (155-Inch)
2013 Ski-Doo Freeride 146 800R E-TEC
vs
2012 Polaris Switchback 600

Mobile - Classic
saved