Back
 Add

Compare:

2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153 VS 2012 Polaris RMK 600 144
 

Overview:

There are 7 differences and 23 similarities between 2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153, 2012 Polaris RMK 600 144

General
Model Year
2012 2012
Manufacturer
Arctic Cat Polaris
Model Type
Mountain Mountain
BASE MSRP(US)
12,099		 9,499
Warranty (months)
12 12
Engine
Fuel capacity
10.6 gal		 11.5 gal
Cylinders
2		 2
Starter
Electric Pull
Engine Type
Horizontal In-line Horizontal In-line
Engine Stroke
2		 2
Valve Configuration
Reed Valve Reed Valve
Displacement
794 cc		 599 cc
Turbocharged
No No
Carburetion Type
Fuel Injected Fuel Injected
Reverse
Yes Yes
Dimensions
Length (ft)
10.42		 10.42
Width
46 in		 46.5 in
Height
51 in
Maximum Ski Stance
41 in		 41 in
Minimum Ski Stance
40 in		 39 in
Dry weight
453 lbs
Track Length
153 in		 144 in
Track Width
15 in		 15 in
Lug Height
2.25 in		 2 in
Features
Heated Hand Grips
Standard Standard
Adjustable Ski Stance
Standard Standard
Materials
Ski Material
Plastic Plastic
Skag Material
Carbide Carbide
Glass
Height
Low Mid
Seats
Number Of Seats
1		 1
Related Comparisons
2012 Ski-Doo Summit SP 800R E-TEC
vs
2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153
2012 Ski-Doo Summit SP 800R E-TEC
vs
2012 Polaris RMK 600 144
2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153
vs
2012 Polaris RMK 600 144
2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153
vs
2012 Polaris PRO-RMK 600 155
2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153
vs
2012 Ski-Doo Summit Sport 600
2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153
vs
2012 Polaris Switchback 600
Popular Comparisons
2013 Polaris RMK 800 Assault 155
vs
2010 Polaris RMK 800 Dragon (155-Inch)
2013 Ski-Doo Freeride 146 800R E-TEC
vs
2012 Polaris Switchback 600

Mobile - Classic
saved