Back
 Add

Compare:

2012 Arctic Cat ProCross XF800 Sno Pro VS 2012 Arctic Cat F570 Base
 

Overview:

There are 7 differences and 21 similarities between 2012 Arctic Cat ProCross XF800 Sno Pro, 2012 Arctic Cat F570 Base

General
Model Year
2012 2012
Manufacturer
Arctic Cat Arctic Cat
Model Type
Performance Performance
BASE MSRP(US)
11,999		 7,199
Warranty (months)
12 12
Engine
Fuel capacity
10.6 gal		 10.8 gal
Cylinders
2		 2
Starter
Pull Electric
Engine Type
Horizontal In-line Horizontal In-line
Engine Stroke
2		 2
Valve Configuration
Reed Valve Reed Valve
Displacement
794 cc		 565 cc
Turbocharged
No No
Carburetion Type
Fuel Injected Carburetor
Reverse
Yes Yes
Dimensions
Length (ft)
10.42		 9.83
Width
48 in		 48 in
Maximum Ski Stance
43 in		 43 in
Minimum Ski Stance
42 in		 43 in
Track Length
141 in		 128 in
Track Width
15 in		 15 in
Lug Height
1.5 in		 1 in
Features
Heated Hand Grips
Standard Standard
Adjustable Ski Stance
Standard
Materials
Ski Material
Plastic Plastic
Skag Material
Carbide Carbide
Glass
Height
Low Mid
Seats
Number Of Seats
1		 1
Related Comparisons
2012 Ski-Doo Summit SP 800R E-TEC
vs
2012 Arctic Cat ProCross XF800 Sno Pro
2012 Ski-Doo Summit SP 800R E-TEC
vs
2012 Arctic Cat F570 Base
2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153
vs
2012 Arctic Cat ProCross XF800 Sno Pro
2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153
vs
2012 Arctic Cat F570 Base
2012 Polaris RMK 600 144
vs
2012 Arctic Cat ProCross XF800 Sno Pro
2012 Polaris RMK 600 144
vs
2012 Arctic Cat F570 Base
Popular Comparisons
2013 Polaris RMK 800 Assault 155
vs
2010 Polaris RMK 800 Dragon (155-Inch)
2013 Ski-Doo Freeride 146 800R E-TEC
vs
2012 Polaris Switchback 600

Mobile - Classic
saved