Back
 Add

Compare:

2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153 VS 2012 Arctic Cat ProCross XF800 Sno Pro
 

Overview:

There are 3 differences and 25 similarities between 2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153, 2012 Arctic Cat ProCross XF800 Sno Pro

General
Model Year
2012 2012
Manufacturer
Arctic Cat Arctic Cat
Model Type
Mountain Performance
BASE MSRP(US)
12,099		 11,999
Warranty (months)
12 12
Engine
Fuel capacity
10.6 gal		 10.6 gal
Cylinders
2		 2
Starter
Electric Pull
Engine Type
Horizontal In-line Horizontal In-line
Engine Stroke
2		 2
Valve Configuration
Reed Valve Reed Valve
Displacement
794 cc		 794 cc
Turbocharged
No No
Carburetion Type
Fuel Injected Fuel Injected
Reverse
Yes Yes
Dimensions
Length (ft)
10.42		 10.42
Width
46 in		 48 in
Maximum Ski Stance
41 in		 43 in
Minimum Ski Stance
40 in		 42 in
Track Length
153 in		 141 in
Track Width
15 in		 15 in
Lug Height
2.25 in		 1.5 in
Features
Heated Hand Grips
Standard Standard
Adjustable Ski Stance
Standard Standard
Materials
Ski Material
Plastic Plastic
Skag Material
Carbide Carbide
Glass
Height
Low Low
Seats
Number Of Seats
1		 1
Related Comparisons
2012 Ski-Doo Summit SP 800R E-TEC
vs
2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153
2012 Ski-Doo Summit SP 800R E-TEC
vs
2012 Arctic Cat ProCross XF800 Sno Pro
2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153
vs
2012 Polaris RMK 600 144
2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153
vs
2012 Polaris PRO-RMK 600 155
2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153
vs
2012 Ski-Doo Summit Sport 600
2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153
vs
2012 Polaris Switchback 600
Popular Comparisons
2013 Polaris RMK 800 Assault 155
vs
2010 Polaris RMK 800 Dragon (155-Inch)
2013 Ski-Doo Freeride 146 800R E-TEC
vs
2012 Polaris Switchback 600

Mobile - Classic
saved