Home > Snowmobiles > 2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 162

2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 162

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related

2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 162

Compare with other Snowmobiles
Compare

2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 162

VS

All other Snowmobiles

General
Model Year		2012			compare 2012 Snowmobiles
Manufacturer		Arctic Cat	vs	24.6% Snowmobiles have Arctic Cat
Model Type		Mountain	vs	27.1% Snowmobiles have Mountain	compare Mountain Snowmobiles
BASE MSRP(US)		12399 (12390 higher than average)	vs	9,136	Compare similar BASE MSRP(US) (12,399)
Warranty (months)		12

Engine
Fuel capacity		10.6 gal (0.01 gal higher than average)	vs	10.59 gal
Cylinders		2 (0.15 lower than average)	vs	2.15	Compare similar Cylinders (2)
Starter		Electric	vs	31.3% Snowmobiles have electric	compare electric Snowmobiles
Engine Type		Horizontal In-line	vs	87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line	compare Horizontal In-line Snowmobiles
Engine Stroke		2 (0.69 lower than average)	vs	2.69	Compare similar Engine Stroke (2)
Valve Configuration		Reed Valve	vs	65.5% Snowmobiles have Reed Valve	compare Reed Valve Snowmobiles
Displacement		794 cc (100.31 cc higher than average)	vs	693.69 cc
Turbocharged		No	vs	93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged	Compare similar don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type		Fuel Injected	vs	57.1% Snowmobiles have Fuel Injected	compare Fuel Injected Snowmobiles
Reverse		Yes	vs	90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse

Dimensions
Length (ft)		10.83 (0.79 higher than average)	vs	10.04
Width		46 in (22.74 in higher than average)	vs	23.26 in
Maximum Ski Stance		41 in (0.05 in lower than average)	vs	41.05 in	Compare similar Maximum Ski Stance (41) in
Minimum Ski Stance		40 in (0.5 in lower than average)	vs	40.50 in	Compare similar Minimum Ski Stance (40) in
Track Length		162 in (25.89 in higher than average)	vs	136.11 in	Compare similar Track Length (162) in
Track Width		15 in (0.57 in lower than average)	vs	15.57 in	Compare similar Track Width (15) in
Lug Height		2.25 in (0.87 in higher than average)	vs	1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips		Standard
Adjustable Ski Stance		Standard

Materials
Ski Material		Plastic	vs	76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic	compare Plastic Snowmobiles
Skag Material		Carbide	vs	71.8% Snowmobiles have Carbide	compare Carbide Snowmobiles

Glass
Height		Low	vs	37.8% Snowmobiles have Low	compare Low Snowmobiles

Seats
Number Of Seats		1 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	1.31	Compare similar Number Of Seats (1)

Related Comparisons

2012 Ski-Doo Summit SP 800R E-TEC

2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 162

2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153

2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 162

2012 Polaris RMK 600 144

2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 162

2012 Polaris PRO-RMK 600 155

2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 162

2012 Ski-Doo Summit Sport 600

2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 162

2012 Polaris Switchback 600

2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 162

Popular Items

2012 Ski-Doo Summit SP 800R E-TEC Compare

2012 Arctic Cat ProClimb M800 Sno Pro 153 Compare

2012 Polaris RMK 600 144 Compare

2012 Polaris PRO-RMK 600 155 Compare

2012 Ski-Doo Summit Sport 600 Compare

2012 Polaris Switchback 600 Compare