VS

Home > Snowmobiles > 2010 Ski-Doo Skandic SWT V-800

2010 Ski-Doo Skandic SWT V-800

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
2010 Ski-Doo Skandic SWT V-800
Compare with other Snowmobiles
 Compare
2010 Ski-Doo Skandic SWT V-800 VS
All other Snowmobiles
General
Model Year 2010  
Manufacturer Ski-doo   vs 37.2% Snowmobiles have Ski-Doo
Model Type Utility  vs 17.9% Snowmobiles have utility
BASE MSRP(US)
10699  (10690 higher than average)
vs
9,136

Warranty (months) 12  
Engine
Fuel capacity
11.1 gal (0.51 gal higher than average)
vs
10.59 gal

Cylinders
(0.15 lower than average)
vs
2.15

Starter Electric / Pull  vs 21.4% Snowmobiles have Electric / Pull
Engine Type Horizontal In-line  vs 87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line
Engine Stroke
(1.31 higher than average)
vs
2.69

Valve Configuration SOHC   vs 1.7% Snowmobiles have SOHC
Displacement
799.9 cc (106.21 cc higher than average)
vs
693.69 cc

Turbocharged No  vs 93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type Fuel Injected  vs 57.1% Snowmobiles have Fuel Injected
Reverse Yes  vs 90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse
Dimensions
Length (ft)
10.08  (0.04 higher than average)
vs
10.04

Width
45.5 in (22.24 in higher than average)
vs
23.26 in

Height
53.3 in (13.07 in higher than average)
vs
40.23 in

Maximum Ski Stance
35.4 in (5.65 in lower than average)
vs
41.05 in

Minimum Ski Stance
35.4 in (5.1 in lower than average)
vs
40.50 in

Dry weight
717 lbs (214.45 lbs higher than average)
vs
502.55 lbs

Track Length
156 in (19.89 in higher than average)
vs
136.11 in

Track Width
24 in (8.43 in higher than average)
vs
15.57 in

Lug Height
1.25 in (0.13 in lower than average)
vs
1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips Standard 
Rear Rack Standard 
Materials
Ski Material Plastic  vs 76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic
Skag Material Carbide  vs 71.8% Snowmobiles have Carbide
Glass
Height High  vs 31.5% Snowmobiles have High
Rearview Mirrors Standard 
Seats
Number Of Seats
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
1.31

Seat Backrest Standard 


Scroll To Top

saved