Home > Snowmobiles > 2010 Arctic Cat Z1 Turbo EXT

2010 Arctic Cat Z1 Turbo EXT

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related

2010 Arctic Cat Z1 Turbo EXT

Compare with other Snowmobiles
Compare

2010 Arctic Cat Z1 Turbo EXT

VS

All other Snowmobiles

General
Model Year		2010			compare 2010 Snowmobiles
Manufacturer		Arctic Cat	vs	24.6% Snowmobiles have Arctic Cat
Model Type		Performance	vs	24% Snowmobiles have Performance	compare Performance Snowmobiles
BASE MSRP(US)		13699 (13690 higher than average)	vs	9,136	Compare similar BASE MSRP(US) (13,699)
Warranty (months)		12

Engine
Fuel capacity		10.8 gal (0.21 gal higher than average)	vs	10.59 gal
Cylinders		2 (0.15 lower than average)	vs	2.15	Compare similar Cylinders (2)
Starter		Electric	vs	31.3% Snowmobiles have electric	compare electric Snowmobiles
Engine Type		Horizontal In-line	vs	87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line	compare Horizontal In-line Snowmobiles
Engine Stroke		4 (1.31 higher than average)	vs	2.69	Compare similar Engine Stroke (4)
Valve Configuration		DOHC	vs	17.6% Snowmobiles have DOHC	compare DOHC Snowmobiles
Displacement		1056 cc (362.31 cc higher than average)	vs	693.69 cc
Turbocharged		Yes	vs	6.1% Snowmobiles have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type		Fuel Injected	vs	57.1% Snowmobiles have Fuel Injected	compare Fuel Injected Snowmobiles
Reverse		Yes	vs	90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse

Dimensions
Length (ft)		10.42 (0.38 higher than average)	vs	10.04
Width		47.3 in (24.04 in higher than average)	vs	23.26 in
Maximum Ski Stance		43 in (1.95 in higher than average)	vs	41.05 in	Compare similar Maximum Ski Stance (43) in
Minimum Ski Stance		43 in (2.5 in higher than average)	vs	40.50 in	Compare similar Minimum Ski Stance (43) in
Track Length		144 in (7.89 in higher than average)	vs	136.11 in	Compare similar Track Length (144) in
Track Width		15 in (0.57 in lower than average)	vs	15.57 in	Compare similar Track Width (15) in
Lug Height		1.25 in (0.13 in lower than average)	vs	1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips		Standard

Materials
Ski Material		Plastic	vs	76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic	compare Plastic Snowmobiles
Skag Material		Carbide	vs	71.8% Snowmobiles have Carbide	compare Carbide Snowmobiles

Glass
Height		Low	vs	37.8% Snowmobiles have Low	compare Low Snowmobiles

Seats
Number Of Seats		1 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	1.31	Compare similar Number Of Seats (1)

Related Comparisons

2010 Polaris RMK 800 Dragon (155-Inch)

2010 Arctic Cat Z1 Turbo EXT

2010 Yamaha Apex MTX

2010 Arctic Cat Z1 Turbo EXT

2010 Polaris Switchback 800 Dragon

2010 Arctic Cat Z1 Turbo EXT

2010 Arctic Cat M8 153

2010 Arctic Cat Z1 Turbo EXT

2010 Polaris RMK 800 Assault

2010 Arctic Cat Z1 Turbo EXT

2010 Ski-Doo Summit Everest 154 800R Power T.E.K.

2010 Arctic Cat Z1 Turbo EXT

Popular Items

2010 Polaris RMK 800 Dragon (155-Inch) Compare

2010 Yamaha Apex MTX Compare

2010 Polaris Switchback 800 Dragon Compare

2010 Arctic Cat M8 153 Compare

2010 Polaris RMK 800 Assault Compare

2010 Ski-Doo Summit Everest 154 800R Power T.E.K. Compare