VS

Home > Snowmobiles > 2007 Ski-Doo Skandic Tundra 300F

2007 Ski-Doo Skandic Tundra 300F

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
2007 Ski-Doo Skandic Tundra 300F
Compare with other Snowmobiles
 Compare
2007 Ski-Doo Skandic Tundra 300F VS
All other Snowmobiles
General
Model Year 2007  
Manufacturer Ski-doo   vs 37.2% Snowmobiles have Ski-Doo
Model Type Utility  vs 17.9% Snowmobiles have utility
BASE MSRP(US)
4799  (4790 higher than average)
vs
9,136

Warranty (months) 12  
Engine
Fuel capacity
9 gal (1.59 gal lower than average)
vs
10.59 gal

Cylinders
(1.15 lower than average)
vs
2.15

Starter Pull  vs 46.6% Snowmobiles have Pull
Engine Type Single-cylinder  vs 6.3% Snowmobiles have Single-Cylinder
Engine Stroke
(0.69 lower than average)
vs
2.69

Valve Configuration Reed Valve  vs 65.5% Snowmobiles have Reed Valve
Displacement
268.7 cc (424.99 cc lower than average)
vs
693.69 cc

Turbocharged No  vs 93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type Carburetor  vs 42.9% Snowmobiles have Carburetor
Reverse Yes  vs 90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse
Dimensions
Length (ft)
9.92  (0.12 lower than average)
vs
10.04

Width
44.6 in (21.34 in higher than average)
vs
23.26 in

Height
51.2 in (10.97 in higher than average)
vs
40.23 in

Maximum Ski Stance
32.2 in (8.85 in lower than average)
vs
41.05 in

Minimum Ski Stance
32.2 in (8.3 in lower than average)
vs
40.50 in

Dry weight
380 lbs (122.55 lbs lower than average)
vs
502.55 lbs

Track Length
136 in (0.11 in lower than average)
vs
136.11 in

Track Width
16 in (0.43 in higher than average)
vs
15.57 in

Lug Height
1.25 in (0.13 in lower than average)
vs
1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips Standard 
Rear Rack Standard 
Materials
Ski Material Plastic  vs 76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic
Skag Material Carbide  vs 71.8% Snowmobiles have Carbide
Glass
Height High  vs 31.5% Snowmobiles have High
Seats
Number Of Seats
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
1.31



Scroll To Top

saved