Home > Snowmobiles > 2006 Ski-Doo Summit Highmark 151 1000 SDI

2006 Ski-Doo Summit Highmark 151 1000 SDI

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related

2006 Ski-Doo Summit Highmark 151 1000 SDI

Compare with other Snowmobiles
Compare

2006 Ski-Doo Summit Highmark 151 1000 SDI

VS

All other Snowmobiles

General
Model Year		2010			compare 2010 Snowmobiles
Manufacturer		Ski-doo	vs	37.2% Snowmobiles have Ski-Doo
Model Type		Mountain	vs	27.1% Snowmobiles have Mountain	compare Mountain Snowmobiles
BASE MSRP(US)		11049 (11040 higher than average)	vs	9,136	Compare similar BASE MSRP(US) (11,049)
Warranty (months)		12

Engine
Fuel capacity		10.6 gal (0.01 gal higher than average)	vs	10.59 gal
Cylinders		2 (0.15 lower than average)	vs	2.15	Compare similar Cylinders (2)
Starter		Pull	vs	46.6% Snowmobiles have Pull	compare Pull Snowmobiles
Engine Type		Horizontal In-line	vs	87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line	compare Horizontal In-line Snowmobiles
Engine Stroke		2 (0.69 lower than average)	vs	2.69	Compare similar Engine Stroke (2)
Valve Configuration		Reed Valve	vs	65.5% Snowmobiles have Reed Valve	compare Reed Valve Snowmobiles
Displacement		998 cc (304.31 cc higher than average)	vs	693.69 cc
Turbocharged		No	vs	93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged	Compare similar don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type		Fuel Injected	vs	57.1% Snowmobiles have Fuel Injected	compare Fuel Injected Snowmobiles
Reverse		Yes	vs	90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse

Dimensions
Maximum Ski Stance		46 in (4.95 in higher than average)	vs	41.05 in	Compare similar Maximum Ski Stance (46) in
Minimum Ski Stance		44 in (3.5 in higher than average)	vs	40.50 in	Compare similar Minimum Ski Stance (44) in
Dry weight		549 lbs (46.45 lbs higher than average)	vs	502.55 lbs	Compare similar Dry weight (549) lbs
Track Length		151 in (14.89 in higher than average)	vs	136.11 in	Compare similar Track Length (151) in
Track Width		16 in (0.43 in higher than average)	vs	15.57 in	Compare similar Track Width (16) in
Lug Height		2.25 in (0.87 in higher than average)	vs	1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips		Standard
Adjustable Ski Stance		Standard
Rear Rack		Standard

Materials
Ski Material		Plastic	vs	76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic	compare Plastic Snowmobiles
Skag Material		Dual Carbide	vs	28% Snowmobiles have Dual Carbide	compare Dual Carbide Snowmobiles

Glass
Height		Mid	vs	27.3% Snowmobiles have Mid	compare Mid Snowmobiles

Seats
Number Of Seats		1 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	1.31	Compare similar Number Of Seats (1)

Related Comparisons

2006 Polaris RMK 600HO

2006 Ski-Doo Summit Highmark 151 1000 SDI

2006 Polaris RMK 700 (144-Inch)

2006 Ski-Doo Summit Highmark 151 1000 SDI

2006 Polaris SwitchBack 900

2006 Ski-Doo Summit Highmark 151 1000 SDI

2006 Polaris RMK 900 (159-Inch)

2006 Ski-Doo Summit Highmark 151 1000 SDI

2006 Yamaha SX Viper Mountain

2006 Ski-Doo Summit Highmark 151 1000 SDI

2006 Arctic Cat M7 EFI Limited 153 Challenger

2006 Ski-Doo Summit Highmark 151 1000 SDI

Popular Items

2006 Polaris RMK 600HO Compare

2006 Polaris RMK 700 (144-Inch) Compare

2006 Polaris SwitchBack 900 Compare

2006 Polaris RMK 900 (159-Inch) Compare

2006 Yamaha SX Viper Mountain Compare

2006 Arctic Cat M7 EFI Limited 153 Challenger Compare