VS

Home > Snowmobiles > 2006 Polaris Super Sport M-10

2006 Polaris Super Sport M-10

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
2006 Polaris Super Sport M-10
Compare with other Snowmobiles
 Compare
2006 Polaris Super Sport M-10 VS
All other Snowmobiles
General
Model Year 2010  
Manufacturer Polaris   vs 24% Snowmobiles have Polaris
Model Type Trail  vs 11.3% Snowmobiles have Trail
BASE MSRP(US)
5499  (5490 higher than average)
vs
9,136

Warranty (months) 12  
Engine
Fuel capacity
11.8 gal (1.21 gal higher than average)
vs
10.59 gal

Cylinders
(0.15 lower than average)
vs
2.15

Starter Pull  vs 46.6% Snowmobiles have Pull
Engine Type Horizontal In-line  vs 87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line
Engine Stroke
(0.69 lower than average)
vs
2.69

Valve Configuration Reed Valve  vs 65.5% Snowmobiles have Reed Valve
Displacement
544 cc (149.69 cc lower than average)
vs
693.69 cc

Turbocharged No  vs 93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type Carburetor  vs 42.9% Snowmobiles have Carburetor
Reverse Yes  vs 90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse
Dimensions
Length (ft)
9.42  (0.62 lower than average)
vs
10.04

Width
48 in (24.74 in higher than average)
vs
23.26 in

Height
46 in (5.77 in higher than average)
vs
40.23 in

Maximum Ski Stance
42.5 in (1.45 in higher than average)
vs
41.05 in

Minimum Ski Stance
42.5 in (2 in higher than average)
vs
40.50 in

Dry weight
470 lbs (32.55 lbs lower than average)
vs
502.55 lbs

Track Length
121 in (15.11 in lower than average)
vs
136.11 in

Track Width
15 in (0.57 in lower than average)
vs
15.57 in

Lug Height
1 in (0.38 in lower than average)
vs
1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips Standard 
Materials
Ski Material Composite  vs 20.7% Snowmobiles have Composite
Skag Material Carbide  vs 71.8% Snowmobiles have Carbide
Glass
Height Mid  vs 27.3% Snowmobiles have Mid
Seats
Number Of Seats
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
1.31



Scroll To Top

saved