VS

Home > Snowmobiles > 2006 Arctic Cat Panther 660

2006 Arctic Cat Panther 660

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
2006 Arctic Cat Panther 660
Compare with other Snowmobiles
 Compare
2006 Arctic Cat Panther 660 VS
All other Snowmobiles
General
Model Year 2010  
Manufacturer Arctic Cat   vs 24.6% Snowmobiles have Arctic Cat
Model Type Touring  vs 15.1% Snowmobiles have Touring
BASE MSRP(US)
6999  (6990 higher than average)
vs
9,136

Warranty (months) 12  
Engine
Fuel capacity
13 gal (2.41 gal higher than average)
vs
10.59 gal

Cylinders
(0.85 higher than average)
vs
2.15

Starter Electric / Pull  vs 21.4% Snowmobiles have Electric / Pull
Engine Type Horizontal In-line  vs 87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line
Engine Stroke
(1.31 higher than average)
vs
2.69

Valve Configuration OHV   vs 15.3% Snowmobiles have OHV
Displacement
660 cc (33.69 cc lower than average)
vs
693.69 cc

Turbocharged No  vs 93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type Fuel Injected  vs 57.1% Snowmobiles have Fuel Injected
Reverse Yes  vs 90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse
Dimensions
Length (ft)
10.67  (0.63 higher than average)
vs
10.04

Width
47 in (23.74 in higher than average)
vs
23.26 in

Height
47 in (6.77 in higher than average)
vs
40.23 in

Maximum Ski Stance
43 in (1.95 in higher than average)
vs
41.05 in

Minimum Ski Stance
43 in (2.5 in higher than average)
vs
40.50 in

Dry weight
620 lbs (117.45 lbs higher than average)
vs
502.55 lbs

Track Length
136 in (0.11 in lower than average)
vs
136.11 in

Track Width
15 in (0.57 in lower than average)
vs
15.57 in

Lug Height
1 in (0.38 in lower than average)
vs
1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips Standard 
Rear Rack Standard 
Materials
Ski Material Plastic  vs 76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic
Skag Material Carbide  vs 71.8% Snowmobiles have Carbide
Glass
Height High  vs 31.5% Snowmobiles have High
Seats
Number Of Seats
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
1.31

Seat Backrest Standard 


Scroll To Top

saved