Home > Snowmobiles > 2006 Arctic Cat F 120

2006 Arctic Cat F 120

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related

2006 Arctic Cat F 120

Compare with other Snowmobiles
Compare

2006 Arctic Cat F 120

VS

All other Snowmobiles

General
Model Year		2010			compare 2010 Snowmobiles
Manufacturer		Arctic Cat	vs	24.6% Snowmobiles have Arctic Cat
Model Type		Youth	vs	4.6% Snowmobiles have Youth	compare Youth Snowmobiles
BASE MSRP(US)		2149 (2140 higher than average)	vs	9,136	Compare similar BASE MSRP(US) (2,149)
Warranty (months)		12

Engine
Fuel capacity		0.5 gal (10.09 gal lower than average)	vs	10.59 gal
Cylinders		1 (1.15 lower than average)	vs	2.15	Compare similar Cylinders (1)
Starter		Pull	vs	46.6% Snowmobiles have Pull	compare Pull Snowmobiles
Engine Type		Single-cylinder	vs	6.3% Snowmobiles have Single-Cylinder	compare Single-Cylinder Snowmobiles
Engine Stroke		4 (1.31 higher than average)	vs	2.69	Compare similar Engine Stroke (4)
Valve Configuration		OHV	vs	15.3% Snowmobiles have OHV	compare OHV Snowmobiles
Displacement		119 cc (574.69 cc lower than average)	vs	693.69 cc
Turbocharged		No	vs	93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged	Compare similar don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type		Carburetor	vs	42.9% Snowmobiles have Carburetor	compare Carburetor Snowmobiles
Reverse		No	vs	9.1% Snowmobiles don't have Reverse	Compare similar don't have Reverse

Dimensions
Length (ft)		6.17 (3.87 lower than average)	vs	10.04
Width		36 in (12.74 in higher than average)	vs	23.26 in
Height		30 in (10.23 in lower than average)	vs	40.23 in
Maximum Ski Stance		32 in (9.05 in lower than average)	vs	41.05 in	Compare similar Maximum Ski Stance (32) in
Minimum Ski Stance		32 in (8.5 in lower than average)	vs	40.50 in	Compare similar Minimum Ski Stance (32) in
Dry weight		165 lbs (337.55 lbs lower than average)	vs	502.55 lbs	Compare similar Dry weight (165) lbs
Track Length		68 in (68.11 in lower than average)	vs	136.11 in	Compare similar Track Length (68) in
Track Width		10 in (5.57 in lower than average)	vs	15.57 in	Compare similar Track Width (10) in
Lug Height		0.69 in (0.69 in lower than average)	vs	1.38 in

Materials
Ski Material		Plastic	vs	76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic	compare Plastic Snowmobiles

Glass
Height		Low	vs	37.8% Snowmobiles have Low	compare Low Snowmobiles

Seats
Number Of Seats		1 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	1.31	Compare similar Number Of Seats (1)

Related Comparisons

2006 Polaris RMK 600HO

2006 Arctic Cat F 120

2006 Polaris RMK 700 (144-Inch)

2006 Arctic Cat F 120

2006 Polaris SwitchBack 900

2006 Arctic Cat F 120

2006 Polaris RMK 900 (159-Inch)

2006 Arctic Cat F 120

2006 Yamaha SX Viper Mountain

2006 Arctic Cat F 120

2006 Arctic Cat M7 EFI Limited 153 Challenger

2006 Arctic Cat F 120

Popular Items

2006 Polaris RMK 600HO Compare

2006 Polaris RMK 700 (144-Inch) Compare

2006 Polaris SwitchBack 900 Compare

2006 Polaris RMK 900 (159-Inch) Compare

2006 Yamaha SX Viper Mountain Compare

2006 Arctic Cat M7 EFI Limited 153 Challenger Compare