VS

Home > Snowmobiles > 2004 Ski-Doo MX Z Trail 500 SS

2004 Ski-Doo MX Z Trail 500 SS

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
2004 Ski-Doo MX Z Trail 500 SS
Compare with other Snowmobiles
 Compare
2004 Ski-Doo MX Z Trail 500 SS VS
All other Snowmobiles
General
Model Year 2004  
Manufacturer Ski-doo   vs 37.2% Snowmobiles have Ski-Doo
Model Type Trail  vs 11.3% Snowmobiles have Trail
BASE MSRP(US)
5949  (5940 higher than average)
vs
9,136

Warranty (months) 12  
Engine
Fuel capacity
10.6 gal (0.01 gal higher than average)
vs
10.59 gal

Cylinders
(0.15 lower than average)
vs
2.15

Starter Pull  vs 46.6% Snowmobiles have Pull
Engine Type Horizontal In-line  vs 87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line
Engine Stroke
(0.69 lower than average)
vs
2.69

Valve Configuration Reed Valve  vs 65.5% Snowmobiles have Reed Valve
Displacement
597 cc (96.69 cc lower than average)
vs
693.69 cc

Turbocharged No  vs 93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type Carburetor  vs 42.9% Snowmobiles have Carburetor
Reverse No  vs 9.1% Snowmobiles don't have Reverse
Dimensions
Length (ft)
9.14  (0.9 lower than average)
vs
10.04

Width
47.8 in (24.54 in higher than average)
vs
23.26 in

Height
50.4 in (10.17 in higher than average)
vs
40.23 in

Maximum Ski Stance
47 in (5.95 in higher than average)
vs
41.05 in

Minimum Ski Stance
47 in (6.5 in higher than average)
vs
40.50 in

Dry weight
459 lbs (43.55 lbs lower than average)
vs
502.55 lbs

Track Length
121 in (15.11 in lower than average)
vs
136.11 in

Track Width
15 in (0.57 in lower than average)
vs
15.57 in

Lug Height
1 in (0.38 in lower than average)
vs
1.38 in

Materials
Ski Material Plastic  vs 76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic
Skag Material Carbide  vs 71.8% Snowmobiles have Carbide
Seats
Number Of Seats
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
1.31



Scroll To Top

saved