VS

Home > Snowmobiles > 2011 Ski-Doo Skandic Tundra 550F

2011 Ski-Doo Skandic Tundra 550F

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
2011 Ski-Doo Skandic Tundra 550F
Compare with other Snowmobiles
 Compare
2011 Ski-Doo Skandic Tundra 550F VS
All other Snowmobiles
General
Model Year 2011  
Manufacturer Ski-doo   vs 37.2% Snowmobiles have Ski-Doo
Model Type Utility  vs 17.9% Snowmobiles have utility
BASE MSRP(US)
6449  (6440 higher than average)
vs
9,136

Warranty (months) 12  
Engine
Fuel capacity
10.6 gal (0.01 gal higher than average)
vs
10.59 gal

Cylinders
(0.15 lower than average)
vs
2.15

Starter Pull  vs 46.6% Snowmobiles have Pull
Engine Type Horizontal In-line  vs 87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line
Engine Stroke
(0.69 lower than average)
vs
2.69

Valve Configuration Reed Valve  vs 65.5% Snowmobiles have Reed Valve
Displacement
553.4 cc (140.29 cc lower than average)
vs
693.69 cc

Turbocharged No  vs 93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type Carburetor  vs 42.9% Snowmobiles have Carburetor
Reverse Yes  vs 90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse
Dimensions
Length (ft)
10.07  (0.03 higher than average)
vs
10.04

Width
39.4 in (16.14 in higher than average)
vs
23.26 in

Height
43.7 in (3.47 in higher than average)
vs
40.23 in

Maximum Ski Stance
32 in (9.05 in lower than average)
vs
41.05 in

Minimum Ski Stance
32 in (8.5 in lower than average)
vs
40.50 in

Dry weight
433 lbs (69.55 lbs lower than average)
vs
502.55 lbs

Track Length
137 in (0.89 in higher than average)
vs
136.11 in

Track Width
15 in (0.57 in lower than average)
vs
15.57 in

Lug Height
1.25 in (0.13 in lower than average)
vs
1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips Standard 
Rear Rack Standard 
Materials
Ski Material Plastic  vs 76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic
Glass
Height Mid  vs 27.3% Snowmobiles have Mid
Seats
Number Of Seats
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
1.31



Scroll To Top

saved