VS

Home > Snowmobiles > 2009 Ski-Doo MX Z X 1200 4-TEC

2009 Ski-Doo MX Z X 1200 4-TEC

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
2009 Ski-Doo MX Z X 1200 4-TEC
Compare with other Snowmobiles
 Compare
2009 Ski-Doo MX Z X 1200 4-TEC VS
All other Snowmobiles
General
Model Year 2009  
Manufacturer Ski-doo   vs 37.2% Snowmobiles have Ski-Doo
Model Type Performance  vs 24% Snowmobiles have Performance
BASE MSRP(US)
11099  (11090 higher than average)
vs
9,136

Warranty (months) 12  
Engine
Fuel capacity
10.6 gal (0.01 gal higher than average)
vs
10.59 gal

Cylinders
(0.85 higher than average)
vs
2.15

Starter Electric  vs 31.3% Snowmobiles have electric
Engine Type Horizontal In-line  vs 87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line
Engine Stroke
(1.31 higher than average)
vs
2.69

Valve Configuration DOHC   vs 17.6% Snowmobiles have DOHC
Displacement
1170.7 cc (477.01 cc higher than average)
vs
693.69 cc

Turbocharged No  vs 93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type Fuel Injected  vs 57.1% Snowmobiles have Fuel Injected
Reverse Yes  vs 90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse
Dimensions
Length (ft)
9.48  (0.56 lower than average)
vs
10.04

Width
47.9 in (24.64 in higher than average)
vs
23.26 in

Height
43.7 in (3.47 in higher than average)
vs
40.23 in

Maximum Ski Stance
47 in (5.95 in higher than average)
vs
41.05 in

Minimum Ski Stance
47 in (6.5 in higher than average)
vs
40.50 in

Dry weight
509 lbs (6.45 lbs higher than average)
vs
502.55 lbs

Track Length
120 in (16.11 in lower than average)
vs
136.11 in

Track Width
15 in (0.57 in lower than average)
vs
15.57 in

Lug Height
1.25 in (0.13 in lower than average)
vs
1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips Standard 
Rear Rack Standard 
Materials
Ski Material Plastic  vs 76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic
Skag Material Dual Carbide  vs 28% Snowmobiles have Dual Carbide
Glass
Height Low  vs 37.8% Snowmobiles have Low
Seats
Number Of Seats
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
1.31



Scroll To Top

saved