VS

Home > Snowmobiles > 2006 Polaris Touring FST

2006 Polaris Touring FST

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
2006 Polaris Touring FST
Compare with other Snowmobiles
 Compare
2006 Polaris Touring FST VS
All other Snowmobiles
General
Model Year 2010  
Manufacturer Polaris   vs 24% Snowmobiles have Polaris
Model Type Touring  vs 15.1% Snowmobiles have Touring
BASE MSRP(US)
9699  (9690 higher than average)
vs
9,136

Warranty (months) 12  
Engine
Fuel capacity
9.2 gal (1.39 gal lower than average)
vs
10.59 gal

Cylinders
(0.15 lower than average)
vs
2.15

Starter Electric  vs 31.3% Snowmobiles have electric
Engine Type Horizontal In-line  vs 87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line
Engine Stroke
(1.31 higher than average)
vs
2.69

Valve Configuration OHV   vs 15.3% Snowmobiles have OHV
Displacement
750 cc (56.31 cc higher than average)
vs
693.69 cc

Turbocharged Yes  vs 6.1% Snowmobiles have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type Fuel Injected  vs 57.1% Snowmobiles have Fuel Injected
Reverse Yes  vs 90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse
Dimensions
Length (ft)
10.75  (0.71 higher than average)
vs
10.04

Width
48 in (24.74 in higher than average)
vs
23.26 in

Height
53 in (12.77 in higher than average)
vs
40.23 in

Maximum Ski Stance
42.5 in (1.45 in higher than average)
vs
41.05 in

Minimum Ski Stance
42.5 in (2 in higher than average)
vs
40.50 in

Dry weight
643 lbs (140.45 lbs higher than average)
vs
502.55 lbs

Track Length
136 in (0.11 in lower than average)
vs
136.11 in

Track Width
15 in (0.57 in lower than average)
vs
15.57 in

Lug Height
1 in (0.38 in lower than average)
vs
1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips Standard 
Materials
Ski Material Composite  vs 20.7% Snowmobiles have Composite
Skag Material Carbide  vs 71.8% Snowmobiles have Carbide
Glass
Height Mid  vs 27.3% Snowmobiles have Mid
Rearview Mirrors Standard 
Seats
Number Of Seats
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
1.31

Seat Backrest Standard 


Scroll To Top

saved