VS

Home > Snowmobiles > 2004 Ski-Doo Skandic WT 600

2004 Ski-Doo Skandic WT 600

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
2004 Ski-Doo Skandic WT 600
Compare with other Snowmobiles
 Compare
2004 Ski-Doo Skandic WT 600 VS
All other Snowmobiles
General
Model Year 2004  
Manufacturer Ski-doo   vs 37.2% Snowmobiles have Ski-Doo
Model Type Utility  vs 17.9% Snowmobiles have utility
BASE MSRP(US)
7999  (7990 higher than average)
vs
9,136

Warranty (months) 12  
Engine
Fuel capacity
10.6 gal (0.01 gal higher than average)
vs
10.59 gal

Cylinders
(0.15 lower than average)
vs
2.15

Starter Electric / Pull  vs 21.4% Snowmobiles have Electric / Pull
Engine Type Horizontal In-line  vs 87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line
Engine Stroke
(0.69 lower than average)
vs
2.69

Valve Configuration Reed Valve  vs 65.5% Snowmobiles have Reed Valve
Displacement
597 cc (96.69 cc lower than average)
vs
693.69 cc

Turbocharged No  vs 93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type Carburetor  vs 42.9% Snowmobiles have Carburetor
Reverse Yes  vs 90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse
Dimensions
Length (ft)
10.33  (0.29 higher than average)
vs
10.04

Width
43.3 in (20.04 in higher than average)
vs
23.26 in

Height
48 in (7.77 in higher than average)
vs
40.23 in

Maximum Ski Stance
35.4 in (5.65 in lower than average)
vs
41.05 in

Minimum Ski Stance
35.4 in (5.1 in lower than average)
vs
40.50 in

Dry weight
605 lbs (102.45 lbs higher than average)
vs
502.55 lbs

Track Length
156 in (19.89 in higher than average)
vs
136.11 in

Track Width
20 in (4.43 in higher than average)
vs
15.57 in

Lug Height
1.25 in (0.13 in lower than average)
vs
1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips Standard 
Rear Rack Standard 
Materials
Ski Material Plastic  vs 76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic
Skag Material Carbide  vs 71.8% Snowmobiles have Carbide
Glass
Height High  vs 31.5% Snowmobiles have High
Rearview Mirrors Standard 
Seats
Number Of Seats
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
1.31

Seat Backrest Standard 


Scroll To Top

saved