Home > Snowmobiles > 2004 Polaris PRO X2 700

2004 Polaris PRO X2 700

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related

2004 Polaris PRO X2 700

Compare with other Snowmobiles
Compare

2004 Polaris PRO X2 700

VS

All other Snowmobiles

General
Model Year		2004			compare 2004 Snowmobiles
Manufacturer		Polaris	vs	24% Snowmobiles have Polaris
Model Type		Performance	vs	24% Snowmobiles have Performance	compare Performance Snowmobiles
BASE MSRP(US)		8899 (8890 higher than average)	vs	9,136	Compare similar BASE MSRP(US) (8,899)
Warranty (months)		12

Engine
Fuel capacity		11.8 gal (1.21 gal higher than average)	vs	10.59 gal
Cylinders		2 (0.15 lower than average)	vs	2.15	Compare similar Cylinders (2)
Starter		Pull	vs	46.6% Snowmobiles have Pull	compare Pull Snowmobiles
Engine Type		Horizontal In-line	vs	87.6% Snowmobiles have Horizontal In-line	compare Horizontal In-line Snowmobiles
Engine Stroke		2 (0.69 lower than average)	vs	2.69	Compare similar Engine Stroke (2)
Valve Configuration		Reed Valve	vs	65.5% Snowmobiles have Reed Valve	compare Reed Valve Snowmobiles
Displacement		700 cc (6.31 cc higher than average)	vs	693.69 cc
Turbocharged		No	vs	93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged	Compare similar don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type		Carburetor	vs	42.9% Snowmobiles have Carburetor	compare Carburetor Snowmobiles
Reverse		Yes	vs	90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse

Dimensions
Length (ft)		9.17 (0.87 lower than average)	vs	10.04
Width		48 in (24.74 in higher than average)	vs	23.26 in
Height		46 in (5.77 in higher than average)	vs	40.23 in
Maximum Ski Stance		42.5 in (1.45 in higher than average)	vs	41.05 in	Compare similar Maximum Ski Stance (42.5) in
Minimum Ski Stance		42.5 in (2 in higher than average)	vs	40.50 in	Compare similar Minimum Ski Stance (42.5) in
Track Length		121 in (15.11 in lower than average)	vs	136.11 in	Compare similar Track Length (121) in
Track Width		15 in (0.57 in lower than average)	vs	15.57 in	Compare similar Track Width (15) in
Lug Height		1.25 in (0.13 in lower than average)	vs	1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips		Standard

Materials
Ski Material		Composite	vs	20.7% Snowmobiles have Composite	compare Composite Snowmobiles
Skag Material		Carbide	vs	71.8% Snowmobiles have Carbide	compare Carbide Snowmobiles

Seats
Number Of Seats		1 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	1.31	Compare similar Number Of Seats (1)

Related Comparisons

2004 Polaris SwitchBack 600

2004 Polaris PRO X2 700

2004 Ski-Doo Summit Adrenaline 800 H.O.

2004 Polaris PRO X2 700

2004 Ski-Doo Summit Adrenaline 600 H.O.

2004 Polaris PRO X2 700

2004 Yamaha SX Viper Mountain

2004 Polaris PRO X2 700

2004 Polaris SwitchBack 700

2004 Polaris PRO X2 700

2004 Ski-Doo Summit Highmark 800 H.O.

2004 Polaris PRO X2 700

Popular Items

2004 Polaris SwitchBack 600 Compare

2004 Ski-Doo Summit Adrenaline 800 H.O. Compare

2004 Ski-Doo Summit Adrenaline 600 H.O. Compare

2004 Yamaha SX Viper Mountain Compare

2004 Polaris SwitchBack 700 Compare

2004 Ski-Doo Summit Highmark 800 H.O. Compare