VS

Home > Snowmobiles > 2004 Arctic Cat Bearcat WideTrack

2004 Arctic Cat Bearcat WideTrack

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
2004 Arctic Cat Bearcat WideTrack
Compare with other Snowmobiles
 Compare
2004 Arctic Cat Bearcat WideTrack VS
All other Snowmobiles
General
Model Year 2004  
Manufacturer Arctic Cat   vs 24.6% Snowmobiles have Arctic Cat
Model Type Utility  vs 17.9% Snowmobiles have utility
BASE MSRP(US)
8999  (8990 higher than average)
vs
9,136

Warranty (months) 12  
Engine
Fuel capacity
15 gal (4.41 gal higher than average)
vs
10.59 gal

Cylinders
(0.85 higher than average)
vs
2.15

Starter Electric / Pull  vs 21.4% Snowmobiles have Electric / Pull
Engine Type In-line  vs 2.9% Snowmobiles have In-line
Engine Stroke
(1.31 higher than average)
vs
2.69

Valve Configuration OHV   vs 15.3% Snowmobiles have OHV
Displacement
660 cc (33.69 cc lower than average)
vs
693.69 cc

Turbocharged No  vs 93.9% Snowmobiles don't have Turbocharged
Carburetion Type Fuel Injected  vs 57.1% Snowmobiles have Fuel Injected
Reverse Yes  vs 90.9% Snowmobiles have Reverse
Dimensions
Length (ft)
11.08  (1.04 higher than average)
vs
10.04

Width
46 in (22.74 in higher than average)
vs
23.26 in

Height
50 in (9.77 in higher than average)
vs
40.23 in

Maximum Ski Stance
42 in (0.95 in higher than average)
vs
41.05 in

Minimum Ski Stance
40 in (0.5 in lower than average)
vs
40.50 in

Dry weight
700 lbs (197.45 lbs higher than average)
vs
502.55 lbs

Track Length
156 in (19.89 in higher than average)
vs
136.11 in

Track Width
20 in (4.43 in higher than average)
vs
15.57 in

Lug Height
1 in (0.38 in lower than average)
vs
1.38 in

Features
Heated Hand Grips Standard 
Adjustable Ski Stance Standard 
Rear Rack Standard 
Materials
Ski Material Plastic  vs 76.8% Snowmobiles have Plastic
Skag Material Carbide  vs 71.8% Snowmobiles have Carbide
Glass
Height High  vs 31.5% Snowmobiles have High
Rearview Mirrors Standard 
Seats
Number Of Seats
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
1.31

Seat Backrest Standard 


Scroll To Top

saved