Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
Model Year
2013
vs
2013
Manufacturer
Arctic Cat
vs
Arctic Cat
Model Type
Performance
vs
Performance
BASE MSRP(US)
14,249
vs
15,399
Warranty (months)
12
vs
12
Engine
Fuel capacity
10.6 gal
vs
10.6 gal
Cylinders
2
vs
2
Starter
Electric
vs
Electric
Engine Type
Horizontal In-line
vs
Horizontal In-line
Engine Stroke
4
vs
4
Valve Configuration
Ohv
vs
Ohv
Displacement
1056 cc
vs
1056 cc
Turbocharged
Yes
vs
Yes
Carburetion Type
Fuel Injected
vs
Fuel Injected
Reverse
Yes
vs
Yes
Dimensions
Length (ft)
9.83
vs
9.83
Width
48 in
vs
48 in
Maximum Ski Stance
43 in
vs
43 in
Minimum Ski Stance
42 in
vs
42 in
Track Length
129 in
vs
129 in
Track Width
15 in
vs
15 in
Lug Height
1.25 in
vs
1.25 in
Features
Heated Hand Grips
Standard
vs
Standard
Adjustable Ski Stance
Standard
vs
Standard
Materials
Ski Material
Plastic
vs
Plastic
Skag Material
Dual Carbide
vs
Carbide
Seats
Number Of Seats
1
vs
1
Compare 2013 Arctic Cat ProCross F1100 Turbo Sno Pro Limited vs 2013 Arctic Cat ProCross F1100 Turbo Sno Pro RR Snowmobiles
cancel