VS

Home > Snowmobiles > Comparison

Compare 2009 Polaris RMK 800 Shift (144-Inch) VS 2009 Polaris RMK 800 Dragon (163-Inch)
 
 
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 2 differences and 28 similarities between 2009 Polaris RMK 800 Shift (144-Inch), 2009 Polaris RMK 800 Dragon (163-Inch)
 
General
Model Year   2009 vs   2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Model Year”

Manufacturer   Polaris vs   Polaris  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Manufacturer”

Model Type   Mountain vs   Mountain  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Model Type”

BASE MSRP(US)   
9,499
vs   11,199
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “BASE MSRP(US)”

Warranty (months)   12 vs   12  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Warranty (months)”

Add Comment about “General

cancel
Engine
Fuel capacity   
11.5 gal
vs   11.5 gal
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Fuel capacity”

Cylinders   
2
vs   2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Cylinders”

Starter   Pull vs   Pull  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Starter”

Engine Type   Horizontal In-line vs   Horizontal In-line  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Type”

Engine Stroke   
2
vs   2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Stroke”

Valve Configuration   Reed Valve vs   Reed Valve  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Valve Configuration”

Displacement   
795 cc
vs   795 cc
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Displacement”

Turbocharged   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Turbocharged”

Carburetion Type   Fuel Injected vs   Fuel Injected  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Carburetion Type”

Reverse   Yes vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Reverse”

Add Comment about “Engine

cancel
Dimensions
Length (ft)   
10.42
vs   11.17
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Length (ft)”

Width   
46.5 in
vs   46.5 in
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Width”

Height   
49.5 in
vs   49.5 in
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Height”

Maximum Ski Stance   
41 in
vs   41 in
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Maximum Ski Stance”

Minimum Ski Stance   
39 in
vs   39 in
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Minimum Ski Stance”

Dry weight   
477 lbs
vs   477 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Dry weight”

Track Length   
144 in
vs   163 in
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Track Length”

Track Width   
15 in
vs   15 in
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Track Width”

Lug Height   
2 in
vs   2.4 in
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Lug Height”

Add Comment about “Dimensions

cancel
Features
Heated Hand Grips   Standard vs   Standard  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Heated Hand Grips”

Adjustable Ski Stance   Standard vs   Standard  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Adjustable Ski Stance”

Rear Rack   Standard vs   Standard  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear Rack”

Add Comment about “Features

cancel
Materials
Skag Material   Carbide vs   Carbide  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Skag Material”

Add Comment about “Materials

cancel
Glass
Height   Low vs   Low  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Height”

Add Comment about “Glass

cancel
Seats
Number Of Seats   
1
vs   1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number Of Seats”

Add Comment about “Seats

cancel

Compare 2009 Polaris RMK 800 Shift (144-Inch) vs 2009 Polaris RMK 800 Dragon (163-Inch) Snowmobiles


Scroll To Top

saved