Home > Snowmobiles > Comparison

Compare	2005 Polaris RMK Trail	VS	2005 Ski-Doo Skandic SUV 600

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

There are 11 differences and 21 similarities between 2005 Polaris RMK Trail, 2005 Ski-Doo Skandic SUV 600

General
Model Year		2005	vs	2005
	[X] Add Comment about “Model Year”
Manufacturer		Polaris	vs	Ski-doo
	[X] Add Comment about “Manufacturer”
Model Type		Mountain	vs	Utility
	[X] Add Comment about “Model Type”
BASE MSRP(US)		5,549	vs	8,349
	[X] Add Comment about “BASE MSRP(US)”
Warranty (months)		12	vs	12
	[X] Add Comment about “Warranty (months)”

Engine
Fuel capacity		11.8 gal	vs	10.6 gal
	[X] Add Comment about “Fuel capacity”
Cylinders		2	vs	2
	[X] Add Comment about “Cylinders”
Starter		Pull	vs	Electric / Pull
	[X] Add Comment about “Starter”
Engine Type		Horizontal In-line	vs	Horizontal In-line
	[X] Add Comment about “Engine Type”
Engine Stroke		2	vs	2
	[X] Add Comment about “Engine Stroke”
Valve Configuration		Reed Valve	vs	Reed Valve
	[X] Add Comment about “Valve Configuration”
Displacement		544 cc	vs	597 cc
	[X] Add Comment about “Displacement”
Turbocharged		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Turbocharged”
Carburetion Type		Carburetor	vs	Carburetor
	[X] Add Comment about “Carburetion Type”
Reverse		Yes	vs	Yes
	[X] Add Comment about “Reverse”

Dimensions
Length (ft)		10.33	vs	10.33
	[X] Add Comment about “Length (ft)”
Width		45.5 in	vs	43.4 in
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		48 in	vs	48 in
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Maximum Ski Stance		41 in	vs	35.4 in
	[X] Add Comment about “Maximum Ski Stance”
Minimum Ski Stance		41 in	vs	35.4 in
	[X] Add Comment about “Minimum Ski Stance”
Dry weight			vs	640 lbs
	[X] Add Comment about “Dry weight”
Track Length		136 in	vs	156 in
	[X] Add Comment about “Track Length”
Track Width		15 in	vs	20 in
	[X] Add Comment about “Track Width”
Lug Height		1.25 in	vs	1.25 in
	[X] Add Comment about “Lug Height”